Verdict Delivered on Charges Against Luis Uribe
A federal jury has found Luis Uribe, a veteran U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent, guilty of using his position to commit acts of violence and deprive rights. The jury determined Uribe assaulted and robbed four Chinese sex workers in Chicago-area hotels in 2022, using his badge and firearm to exert power.
Trial Details and Jury’s Decision
The jury, made up of six men and six women, deliberated for 6 1/2 hours. They found Uribe guilty on 11 counts, including deprivation of rights under color of law and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Uribe showed no reaction in the courtroom as the verdict was read.
He faces a sentencing of 7 years to life in prison, with the hearing set for January 21. The trial shed light on the exploitation within the Chinese sex trade, highlighting how immigrants often fall victim to forced labor.
Prosecutor’s and Defense’s Arguments
Prosecutors argued Uribe abused his authority, switching roles from law enforcement to perpetrator. The defense, however, claimed the victims were fabricating their stories, aiming to manipulate Uribe for immigration assistance.
Key evidence included Uribe’s government-issued handgun and badge, alongside DNA found at one crime scene. Additionally, a controversial photo from Uribe’s phone showed him with the gun used in the attacks.
Victims’ Testimonies and Key Evidence
The victims testified through interpreters, identifying Uribe as their attacker. A notable piece of evidence was a photo shared via WeChat, warning others about Uribe’s actions. Testimony revealed offers of bribery, with promises of free sex to avoid further attacks.
Uribe’s Denial and Trial Conclusion
Uribe testified in his defense, denying the allegations and claiming all encounters were consensual. He argued he was threatened by the women, who allegedly tried to frame him. An exchange during cross-examination drew attention when he equated an encounter to a workout, which the prosecution used to challenge his credibility.
In closing statements, the defense attempted to downplay Uribe’s controversial comment as a result of frustration. The prosecutor emphasized the gravity of the evidence against Uribe, urging the jury to recognize his actions as those of a “rapist with a gun, not a law enforcer.”

Spotlight on Grieving Father in Lindsay Clancy Case
Juror in Lindsay Clancy Case Retains High-Profile Lawyer
Florida Plastic Surgeon Faces Trial for Allegedly Murdering Attorney
Lindsay Clancy Trial Juror Mistrial Sparks Legal Scrutiny
Grand Jury Declines Indictments in Nolan Wells’ Case
Vermont Shooting Verdict