Parents of Autistic First-Grader in Georgia Seek Understanding Over School Suspension Policies

The parents of a Georgia first-grader with autism express concern over their son’s suspension for biting a sandwich into the shape of a gun during lunch, arguing that the school’s disciplinary policies overlook his developmental disabilities.

Suspension Incident

John Medina, age 6, was suspended last March at Sarah Harp Elementary School in Fayette County, Georgia. Diagnosed with level 1 autism at 4 years old and later with ADHD, John has difficulty understanding social norms. His parents, Kristin and Juan “Ricky” Medina, say the school’s strict disciplinary approach has led to numerous suspensions and disciplinary actions against their son since 2023.

Impact on Self-Esteem and Socialization

The disciplinary actions have affected John’s self-esteem. His parents note that John often feels isolated and struggles to make friends. He refers to himself as a “bad kid” due to how he perceives treatment by peers and the school environment.

Concerns About School’s Policies

Kristin and Ricky Medina were shocked by John’s suspension over a sandwich, questioning the school’s “strike” system. This system reportedly escalates minor actions, like hand gestures or saying “gun,” to suspension.

Lack of Developmental Assistance

Initially, the school denied John’s need for an Individualized Education Program (IEP), citing his academic advancement. Kristin explains it required multiple suspensions and an ADHD diagnosis before the school approved his IEP.

Family Advocacy and Current Progress

The Medina family sought the help of Donna Reynolds, a special education advocate. Recently, suspensions have eased. John follows a behavioral plan involving an aide during lunch, recess, and PE, and learns in a calmer classroom setting where he performs well.

Despite challenges, John completed the previous school year strong, reading at a third-grade level and near entrance for the gifted program.

Fayette County Public Schools responded to inquiries about John’s situation, suggesting a review of his complete disciplinary history rather than focusing on isolated events.