Published by the Manhattan Institute, City Journal often tackles urban policy. Criticisms of gifted education are not new, yet recent critiques have become increasingly unreasonable. In New York, writer Katie Arnold-Ratliff raised doubts about the existence of student giftedness. She argued that gifted programs might be futile because in a study, only 12.3% of gifted students achieved ’eminence’ by the age of 50. This suggests that 88% never attained significant success levels, such as becoming Fortune 500 executives or prominent journalists.
This viewpoint highlights a broader debate about the role and efficacy of gifted education within the academic system. It brings into question the criteria used to measure the long-term success of such programs, especially when considering diverse career paths and achievements beyond high-profile accolades.
As these discussions continue, communities face a challenge in balancing educational equity and fostering individual talents. The complexities of measuring success, which varies widely among individuals, often complicate policy decisions in education.
Mississippi Professor Exposes Student Use of AI for Cheating 
Tuskegee University Enforces New Dress Code and Guidelines to Promote Professionalism 
Khalib Townsend’s Passion for Birds Finds a Mentor 
The Role of AI in Education: Balancing Technology and Learning 
Long Legal Battle Over Student Loan Forgiveness Nears Conclusion 
21st Century Charter High School: Pioneering New School Year Initiatives