The Supreme Court has decided to examine the constitutionality of a federal ban on home distilling of spirits, a regulation nearly 160 years old. This decision, made on Monday, revisits a law that was originally put in place in 1868 to prevent tax evasion.
Scott McNutt from Robbinsville, New Jersey, has brought forth the challenge to this longstanding prohibition. McNutt, who currently owns a still used for producing fuel alcohol, contends that the ban infringes on his rights. He has expressed interest in legally experimenting with distilling spirits at home.
McNutt’s case raises questions about the validity and relevance of historical regulations in today’s legal and cultural context.
Advocating for Clean Slate Act to Remove Employment Barriers 
No Stopping the Canal Street Counterfeit Market 
NYC Mayor Calls for End to ICE Enforcement After Shooting 
California Couple Accused of Surrogate Abuse and Surveillance 
Shortened Training for Police Officers Assisting in Immigration Arrests 
Calls for Recusal in Cornell Assault Investigation