Former Biden special counsel Jack Smith faces allegations of misleading Congress. Republicans have accused Smith of providing false testimony about the scope of his investigation into former President Donald Trump.
Criminal Referral Issued
Jim Jordan, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman and Republican from Ohio, has issued a criminal referral for Smith. Jordan claims that newly uncovered records contradict Smith’s statements to the committee. He asserts that Smith had falsely testified about not obtaining or reviewing lawmakers’ text messages during investigations into President Trump.
All individuals have an obligation to comply with a duly authorized congressional inquiry. Mr. Smith, a former public servant, is no different.– Jim Jordan
Jordan’s letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche alleges that Smith obstructed the committee’s oversight by making intentionally false statements. Jordan suggests that the Justice Department should evaluate whether Smith’s actions deserve criminal charges.
Smith’s Testimony Challenged
The allegations focus on Smith’s testimony during a December deposition to the House Judiciary Committee. Jordan argues that Smith misled the committee by suggesting that his team did not have access to lawmakers’ text messages.
Documentation released by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley indicates that Smith’s team viewed text messages from 44 members of Congress and White House staff. Included in the targeted individuals were lawmakers like Jim Jordan and Chuck Grassley, as well as officials linked to former President Trump.
Privacy Concerns Raised
Republicans express concerns about Smith’s team violating constitutional privacy protections. Documents suggest that investigative protocols were breached. Text messages were reportedly accessed without a “filter team” reviewing them, threatening the confidentiality of privileged information.
Smith provided a different version during his testimony. He stated that his team only pursued telephone toll records, which provide information about call data without revealing content.
The Justice Department has yet to offer a comment on the matter.

Trump Revives Energy Dispute with California over Offshore Drilling
Ossoff and Collins Fundraising and Polls in Georgia Senate Race
Challenges Ahead for Democrats Seeking Change
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche Faces Senate Judiciary Committee Amid Controversy
Kansas Voters to Decide on Electing State Supreme Court Justices
Attorney General Ends Trump’s Controversial ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’