During a dinner conversation, my friend Cristina mentioned her upcoming prostate exam. Years back, I might have been surprised, assuming she made an error. Now, I felt admiration for her openness. Reflecting on our initial meeting, I appreciated she shared her personal health journey on her own terms.
Among friends, some familiar to Cristina, others not, the men groaned, empathizing with her about the invasive nature of such medical exams. This reaction sparked a memory of listening to a public radio show discussing ‘people with prostate cancer.’ My partner, Hugh, asked if it should specify ‘men with prostate cancer.’
I clarified that transgender women can have prostate issues. Hugh paused, considering the misconception that transitioning to female involves losing the prostate. He mused that if such procedures eliminated prostate concerns, many would opt to transition after turning 60, simplifying life and reducing health issues.
Cristina’s bravery struck me, especially considering her Filipino background. Her courage in embracing her identity deserved recognition. On a personal note, knowing Cristina gave me insight into diverse experiences, though it raised questions about tokenism in how I referred to her in discussions.
The next morning, an email from Cristina corrected her initial statement. She had confused her appointments. It was a colonoscopy, not a prostate exam. I replied, understanding how such mix-ups happen.
“The Land and Its People: Essays” by David Sedaris, available in various formats from major retailers.
For further reading on the complexities of prostate health and transgender experiences, visit davidsedarisbooks.com.

Brain Games and Their Effectiveness
U.S. Faces Severe Measles Outbreak, Focuses on Vaccination
Changing Perspectives on Alcohol’s Health Impacts
Jessica Sanchez’s Journey Through Diagnosis and Advocacy
Controversy Over Autism Therapy Cuts for Georgia Foster Children
Increasing Number of Men Taking Paid Bonding Leave in California