Cornell University Fraternity Case Reopened Amid Allegations

New developments have surfaced in the case of a former Cornell University student who claims she was drugged and gang-raped at a fraternity house in October 2024. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, filed a civil lawsuit against seven former Chi Phi fraternity members and the university. She alleges that they failed to protect her from the assault.

Claims Against Cornell University

In the lawsuit, Doe claims she visited the Chi Phi fraternity while intoxicated and alleges two members pressured her into taking ketamine before sexually assaulting her. According to the suit, at around 1:42 a.m., a crude message was sent to a fraternity group chat suggesting a woman upstairs was available for sex. She alleges multiple men entered the room, continuing the assaults until 5:45 a.m.

Doe reported the alleged rapes to the campus police three weeks later. Her attorney, Thomas Giuffra, stated, “Once she was emotionally ready, she went to the University police and bravely shared what had occurred to her.”

Cornell conducted an internal investigation involving a hearing where trained faculty and staff reviewed evidence, resulting in various sanctions against the accused, including expulsions. The fraternity was closed in 2024.

Criminal Investigation Reopened

The Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office has decided to reopen the criminal investigation following community pressure. District Attorney Matthew Van Houten noted differences between Doe’s sworn statement in November 2024 and the civil lawsuit. Her statement did not include allegations of being drugged or gang-raped.

Giuffra disputes that Doe spoke with DA investigators following her report to campus police. He emphasizes the difficulty of interviewing assault survivors, which requires experience and trust.

Van Houten expressed willingness to revisit the case, stating, “We have begun the process of reopening the investigation and will bring evidence before the Grand Jury.” Giuffra welcomed the reopening, though he hopes for a thorough examination of the case.

Defendant’s Response

Jeremy Saland, attorney for one accused, Scott Kretzchmar, recognizes the inappropriateness of Snapchat messages but denies they imply guilt. Saland stated that Kretzchmar briefly entered the room without any physical interaction.

He mentioned a hair follicle test showing no ketamine in Kretzchmar’s system and welcomes the opportunity to present exonerating evidence.

Cornell supports the DA’s decision to reopen the investigation, aiming for justice and accountability.