Controversy Surrounding Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

Automated license plate readers (ALPRs), including Flock cameras, have faced criticism across the U.S. recently. Flock is a well-known name in this field, but various similar technologies exist. These devices focus on capturing data such as a vehicle’s license plate, make, model, and color.

Flock claims its technology can record vehicles moving at speeds up to 100 MPH, during both day and night, from a distance of up to 75 ft. Their system can also classify vehicles as resident or non-resident, recognize temporary or standard plates, and detect alterations like a broken taillight. Genetec offers a system capable of estimating a vehicle’s travel speed, while Motorola Solutions’ technology can identify unique features such as bumper stickers or damage. Flock cameras do not track each vehicle in a jurisdiction but capture images of vehicles that pass their view.

For those interested in ALPR locations, DeFlock provides a crowd-sourced map identifying ALPR positions in the U.S. This map relies on volunteers and the OpenStreetMap community, not official data from companies or agencies. However, Nexstar has not independently verified these camera locations.

ALPRs have been operational for over two decades, per the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. These systems, often situated on poles or streetlights, scan and compare license plates with databases, alerting law enforcement when needed. Officers can review collected data to track vehicles and coordinate with other agencies.

Despite their capabilities, some localities in North Carolina, Indiana, Colorado, and Wisconsin have ceased using ALPRs. The Florida Department of Transportation is removing cameras due to privacy issues and accusations of misuse, similar to actions in Texas. Yet, ALPRs have defenders, including former President Trump, who expressed approval due to their utility in law enforcement, despite some seeing them as an infringement on privacy.