Recent events have sparked a noticeable shift in attitudes toward gun ownership in the United States, particularly among groups previously opposed or indifferent to firearms. Following controversial messaging from federal authorities about gun holders, a surge of interest has emerged from diverse demographics, including women, people of color, and liberals.
Gun organizations nationwide are witnessing an unprecedented rise in requests for firearm training. Reports from national gun coalitions and local instructors confirm this trend, as detailed in interviews conducted by NBC News over recent weeks. This heightened interest coincides with a series of incidents involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and their interactions with citizens during enforcement operations.
The most prominent case is the January shooting of Minneapolis residents Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Both were U.S. citizens, and both incidents have raised widespread concerns about potential violations of constitutional rights. Alex Pretti, for example, was fatally shot by federal agents while legally carrying a concealed firearm. The Department of Homeland Security accused Pretti of intending harm, although video evidence contradicts these claims.
This situation sparked significant public discourse, prompting statements from political figures, including then-President Donald Trump. Trump criticized Pretti’s decision to carry a gun, suggesting he should not have been armed. This echoed sentiments expressed by Jeanine Pirro, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, who initially supported Trump’s views on national television before retracting her statements.
Amid this backdrop, Lara Smith, spokesperson for the Liberal Gun Club, noted a dramatic shift in perspectives among left-leaning individuals. The urgency for firearm training has escalated since the ICE activities in Minneapolis, especially after Pretti’s shooting. According to Smith, the emerging motivation is not about preparing for an uprising but rather an acknowledgment of the Second Amendment as an essential right within the Bill of Rights.
The level of interest is so high that we are struggling to accommodate all the training requests which have surged significantly this year, with a notable increase from women.— Lara Smith, Liberal Gun Club
Gun trainers like Jordan Siemering, co-founder of Grassroots Defense in Iowa, have observed a marked increase in firearms interest across the country. This mirrors the spike seen after the George Floyd incident in 2020, but surpasses it in scale. Siemering noted that many of the new participants, described as ‘nontraditional gun owners’, encompass diverse groups such as women, the LGBTQ+ community, and people of color.
The widespread interest is supported by John Commerford, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action. In a statement, he highlighted the broadening demographics of new gun owners, indicative of a broader shift in attitudes toward firearm ownership across different political and cultural landscapes.
The trend is equally evident in clubs such as ‘A Girl & A Gun’, which reported a 52% increase in requests for instructor-led training in January alone, marking it as the highest in six months. The club’s President and CEO, Robyn Sandoval, attributes this shift to evolving motivations, where participants now seek not just security, but competency in firearm handling.
This transition is similarly experienced by Progressive Shooters in Los Angeles, where bookings for firearm classes surged following Pretti’s shooting. Tom Nguyen, the founder, reported being overwhelmed by the demand, with weekend classes fully booked shortly after the incident.
Becky Bieker, a firearm trainer in northern Virginia, also recognized an uptick in women’s interest in training, driven by concerns over the unstable national climate. Pretti’s shooting catalyzed this response, propelling individuals toward training and assertive usage of their constitutional rights.
Finally, Ed Gardner, executive director of the Liberal Gun Club, remarked on the deeper implications of these events. He questioned the state of constitutional rights, emphasizing the danger posed when mere presence near a firearm or participation in a protest leads to fatal outcomes.
If merely possessing a firearm equates to a death sentence, then our rights to bear arms are under threat, and similarly, protestors face dangers to their First Amendment rights.— Ed Gardner, Liberal Gun Club

Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Insulate Consumers from Data Center Power Costs
Michigan Democratic Senate Candidates Debate Corporate PAC Contributions Amid Labor Forum
Senator Mitch McConnell Returns Home After Hospitalization
Former Deputy to Ex-Special Counsel Jack Smith Announces Congressional Run in Virginia
House of Representatives Prepares for Vote on Federal Voter ID Legislation
North Carolina Lawmaker Challenges Sheriff’s Understanding of Government Structure